Sex Offender Events Chronology
A chronology of events leading up to Monday's
ruling by the Colorado Supreme Court regarding the appropriate
length of parole for certain sex offenders.
1977: The Legislature approves a law giving the Parole Board
discretion to set the term of parole.
1979: The Legislature modifies the 1977 law, saying parole terms must
be limited to the lesser of the unserved portion of the defendant's
original prison term or five years.
1993: The Legislature approves tougher sentencing for sex offenders
that requires five years of parole after a prison release.
1996: Lawmakers lengthen parole terms for sex offenders, but in an
apparent oversight, use language from the 1979 law, essentially
returning to discretionary parole terms to be determined by parole
officials but not exceeding the maximum sentence imposed by the
court.
1998: Lawmakers approve lifetime parole for sex offenders.
March 2, 2000: The Colorado Court of Appeals finds in an appeal filed
by David Cooper that sex offenders could not be placed on parole
for longer than their original prison sentence.
April, 2000: Under that decision, 18 sex offenders in custody for
parole violations are released. Twenty-five are released from
custody but not placed on parole after completing their prison
terms, and 39 are released from parole.
Sept. 18, 2000: The Colorado Supreme Court rules unanimously in a case
involving Vance Martin that the 1993 law conflicted with the 1979
law limiting how long sex offenders can be placed on parole. Prison
officials begin planning to release sex offenders from prison and
parole.
By Sept. 30, 2000: Nine of 112 sex offenders in custody for parole
violations are released, and 84 are released from parole. Attorney
General Ken Salazar halts further releases.
Oct. 1, 2000: Salazar says prison officials acted too quickly in
releasing parolees without a court mandate. Corrections Chief John
Suthers says he understood judicial review was just a formality.
Oct. 5, 2000: A district judge refuses to issue arrest warrants for
nine offenders who were released.
Oct. 6, 2000: Salazar acknowledges his staff and corrections officials
made a serious mistake by releasing the nine without seeking a
court mandate. The Supreme Court agrees to reconsider its Sept. 18
ruling and orders Salazar to take no further action until justices
issue a ruling.
Oct. 8, 2000: Eight of the nine offenders released from prison
sentences imposed for parole violations are arrested.
Oct. 11, 2000: The ninth offender released from a prison term imposed
for a parole violation is arrested.
Oct. 21, 2000: Authorities continue working to round up the sex
offenders released from prison or parole in April who had not
already been taken back into custody.
December, 2000: The state public defender files a brief with the
Supreme Court arguing that parole terms for sex offenders who are
released early from prison cannot be longer than the original
sentence. He argues that lawmakers intended parole to be served
instead of prison, rather than in addition to a prison term.
Jan. 10, 2001: Salazar asks lawmakers to strengthen sex-offender
registration laws in preparation of the possibility that the
Supreme Court would uphold its Sept. 18 decision, which he said
could lead to the release from prison or parole of 1,600 offenders.
Feb. 15, 2001: A Pueblo district judge orders the release of one
inmate who was sent back to prison after he was released because of
the Supreme Court's decision.
Feb. 22, 2001: A different district judge in Pueblo orders the release
of another inmate who was sent back to prison after having been
released in September.
March 8, 2001: Three more inmates arrested after having been released
in September are ordered released again by different judges.
Salazar announces plans to appeal such releases.
March 13, 2001: The Supreme Court hears oral arguments in the cases of
five sex offenders affected by the September ruling.
June 25, 2001: The Supreme Court rules in favor of the defendants,
ruling that parole terms for sex offenders who are released early from
prison cannot be longer than the original sentence.
Copyright 2002 by TheDenverChannel.com. The Associated Press contributed to this report. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.








