TheDenverChannel.com










Denver News
E-Mail News Alerts
Get breaking news and daily headlines.
Browse all e-mail newsletters
Related To Story

Bill Would Prohibit No-Suing Clause In Nursing Home Contracts

Lawmaker Says People Deserve Day In Court

POSTED: 4:47 pm MDT April 10, 2008
UPDATED: 5:26 pm MDT April 10, 2008

One state lawmaker believes more and more nursing homes are taking advantage of elderly patients and their families by including binding arbitration clauses in their contracts, and she is sponsoring legislation to prohibit the clauses.

"Binding arbitration means you don't get your day in court," said Rep. Cheri Jahn, D-Wheat Ridge.

The arbitration clauses mean that no matter how egregious the treatment, the patient can't file suit in public court to settle a dispute, Jahn said. The patient can only negotiate behind private doors with an arbitrator chosen by the nursing home, she said.

"More and more they're placing them in these contracts, and people literally don't know what they're signing. That is wrong," Jahn said.

Mike Trenkle, of Elizabeth, experienced the issue firsthand after admitting his grandmother into a Colorado nursing home.

"You just sign whatever you do because you care for your loved one," said Trenkle.

He said after a negligent physical therapist caused his grandmother to break her leg, he pulled her out of the home and tried to sue, but he had signed a binding arbitration agreement.

The arbitration procedures dragged on for more than two years, until she died in January.

"When you've got these arbitration agreements there's nothing to make these people toe the line," he said.

Jahn said she is drafting a late bill to ban binding arbitration agreements in long-term care contracts.

The Colorado Health Care Association, a trade organization representing the state's nursing homes, is opposed to the bill.

In a statement, the groups general counsel, Fred Miles, wrote:

"The process is not mandatory and may not be a condition of admission to any facility; in fact, the agreement may be rescinded by the patient or responsible party within 90 days of signing if they so choose. It is condescending to suggest or imply that these citizens should be denied this right because they don't know what they are doing -- we venture to say that the real motive behind this bill relates to the monetary desire of trial lawyers to further litigation and to 'control' their clients. The increased cost associated with litigation will be borne by you and I as citizens (in the form of increasing the cost of long-term care to private payers) and the taxpayers (as such cost increases will be passed on to governmentally funded health care programs such as Medicare and Medicaid)."

Links We Like

Sponsored Content
There is no absolute number of drinks per day that defines alcoholism. Learn the behavior and body reactions that constitute alcoholism. More

By designing a great outdoor living space you can quickly enhance the value of your home and make it more appealing to potential buyers. More

If you have aspirations of becoming a millionaire, check out these five habits that may be worth emulating. More

The signs of Cancer can sometimes be very subtle. Here's a guide to help you recognize them early. More

MyReport Network

E - News Registration focus group
  My Report Network: Tell your story on 7NEWS. Sign up to be a member of our My Report Network
Sponsored Links

MyReport Network

E - News Registration focus group
  My Report Network: Tell your story on 7NEWS. Sign up to be a member of our My Report Network

Job Searching Tips