Could blanket policies based on religion or national origin legally happen again?

2016 election has given debate new life

More than 70 years ago, the U.S. Supreme Court handed down a decision often regarded as one of the worst in its long history.

In Korematsu v. United States, the court validated putting American citizens in internment camps during wartime, based on their race or ethnicity. The decision came in the wake of President Franklin Roosevelt’s Executive Order 9066, which came after the Pearl Harbor attack and granted the U.S. military the power to ban tens of thousands of American citizens of Japanese ancestry from areas deemed critical to domestic security.

The court has never overturned the Korematsu decision, and  the 2016 presidential election has given debate over the case has new life. Supporters of President-elect Donald Trump say a registry of immigrants from Muslim countries would pass constitutional muster, citing the internment of Japanese-Americans during World War II.

On this DecodeDC podcast, we ask if these suggestions for blanket policies based on religion or national origin—like the Japanese internment camps upheld in Korematsu—could legally happen again.



To listen to other DecodeDC podcasts, watch edgy videos and read blog posts about politics, politicians and policy, go to DecodeDC.com

Print this article Back to Top